########################################################### testssl.sh 3.0rc5 from https://testssl.sh/dev/ This program is free software. Distribution and modification under GPLv2 permitted. USAGE w/o ANY WARRANTY. USE IT AT YOUR OWN RISK! Please file bugs @ https://testssl.sh/bugs/ ########################################################### Using "OpenSSL 1.0.2-chacha (1.0.2k-dev)" [~183 ciphers] on s1008:/virtual/sslcheck/testssl/testssl.sh-3.0rc5/bin/openssl.Linux.x86_64 (built: "Jan 18 17:12:17 2019", platform: "linux-x86_64") Start 2019-09-19 00:15:29 --\>\> 210.197.64.173:443 (direct.tos.hirogin.co.jp) \<\<-- rDNS (210.197.64.173): 210197064173.cidr.odn.ne.jp. Service detected: HTTP Testing protocols via sockets except NPN+ALPN SSLv2 not offered (OK) SSLv3 offered (NOT ok) TLS 1 offered TLS 1.1 offered TLS 1.2 offered (OK) TLS 1.3 not offered NPN/SPDY not offered ALPN/HTTP2 not offered Testing cipher categories NULL ciphers (no encryption) not offered (OK) Anonymous NULL Ciphers (no authentication) not offered (OK) Export ciphers (w/o ADH+NULL) not offered (OK) LOW: 64 Bit + DES, RC[2,4] (w/o export) offered (NOT ok) Triple DES Ciphers / IDEA offered (NOT ok) Average: SEED + 128+256 Bit CBC ciphers offered Strong encryption (AEAD ciphers) offered (OK) Testing robust (perfect) forward secrecy, (P)FS -- omitting Null Authentication/Encryption, 3DES, RC4 No ciphers supporting Forward Secrecy offered Testing server preferences Has server cipher order? yes (OK) Negotiated protocol TLSv1.2 Negotiated cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 Cipher order SSLv3: AES128-SHA AES256-SHA RC4-SHA RC4-MD5 DES-CBC3-SHA TLSv1: AES128-SHA AES256-SHA RC4-SHA RC4-MD5 DES-CBC3-SHA TLSv1.1: AES128-SHA AES256-SHA RC4-SHA RC4-MD5 DES-CBC3-SHA TLSv1.2: AES128-GCM-SHA256 AES256-GCM-SHA384 AES128-SHA256 AES256-SHA256 AES128-SHA AES256-SHA DES-CBC3-SHA Testing server defaults (Server Hello) TLS extensions (standard) "renegotiation info/#65281" "max fragment length/#1" Session Ticket RFC 5077 hint no -- no lifetime advertised SSL Session ID support yes Session Resumption Tickets no, ID: yes TLS clock skew Random values, no fingerprinting possible Signature Algorithm SHA256 with RSA Server key size RSA 2048 bits Server key usage Digital Signature, Key Encipherment Server extended key usage TLS Web Server Authentication, TLS Web Client Authentication Serial / Fingerprints 06436012CB4E5031274A3CB8E1F73739 / SHA1 B29C5DECAF59700CE09BF280F0BD9C370EEA2066 SHA256 F68ED4406EB2D494DB5555CA4693B62253B8AF2935939A731B5EC1CB98B771A8 Common Name (CN) direct.tos.hirogin.co.jp subjectAltName (SAN) direct.tos.hirogin.co.jp Issuer DigiCert SHA2 Extended Validation Server CA (DigiCert Inc from US) Trust (hostname) Ok via SAN and CN (same w/o SNI) Chain of trust Ok EV cert (experimental) yes \"eTLS\" (visibility info) not present Certificate Validity (UTC) 156 \>= 60 days (2019-09-11 09:00 --> 2020-02-22 21:00) # of certificates provided 4 Certificate Revocation List http://crl3.digicert.com/sha2-ev-server-g2.crl http://crl4.digicert.com/sha2-ev-server-g2.crl OCSP URI http://ocsp.digicert.com OCSP stapling not offered OCSP must staple extension -- DNS CAA RR (experimental) not offered Certificate Transparency yes (certificate extension) Testing HTTP header response @ \"/\" HTTP Status Code 302 Found, redirecting to "/index.html" HTTP clock skew 0 sec from localtime Strict Transport Security not offered Public Key Pinning -- Server banner (no "Server" line in header, interesting!) Application banner -- Cookie(s) (none issued at "/") -- maybe better try target URL of 30x Security headers -- Reverse Proxy banner -- Testing vulnerabilities Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) not vulnerable (OK), no heartbeat extension CCS (CVE-2014-0224) not vulnerable (OK) Ticketbleed (CVE-2016-9244), experiment. not vulnerable (OK), no session ticket extension ROBOT not vulnerable (OK) Secure Renegotiation (CVE-2009-3555) not vulnerable (OK) Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation not vulnerable (OK) CRIME, TLS (CVE-2012-4929) not vulnerable (OK) BREACH (CVE-2013-3587) no HTTP compression (OK) - only supplied "/" tested POODLE, SSL (CVE-2014-3566) VULNERABLE (NOT ok), uses SSLv3+CBC (check TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV mitigation below) TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV (RFC 7507) Downgrade attack prevention NOT supported and vulnerable to POODLE SSL SWEET32 (CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6329) VULNERABLE, uses 64 bit block ciphers FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) not vulnerable (OK) DROWN (CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-0703) not vulnerable on this host and port (OK) make sure you don't use this certificate elsewhere with SSLv2 enabled services https://censys.io/ipv4?q=F68ED4406EB2D494DB5555CA4693B62253B8AF2935939A731B5EC1CB98B771A8 could help you to find out LOGJAM (CVE-2015-4000), experimental not vulnerable (OK): no DH EXPORT ciphers, no DH key detected with <= TLS 1.2 BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) SSL3: AES128-SHA AES256-SHA DES-CBC3-SHA TLS1: AES128-SHA AES256-SHA DES-CBC3-SHA VULNERABLE -- but also supports higher protocols TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 (likely mitigated) LUCKY13 (CVE-2013-0169), experimental potentially VULNERABLE, uses cipher block chaining (CBC) ciphers with TLS. Check patches RC4 (CVE-2013-2566, CVE-2015-2808) VULNERABLE (NOT ok): RC4-SHA RC4-MD5 Testing 370 ciphers via OpenSSL plus sockets against the server, ordered by encryption strength Hexcode Cipher Suite Name (OpenSSL) KeyExch. Encryption Bits Cipher Suite Name (IANA/RFC) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x9d AES256-GCM-SHA384 RSA AESGCM 256 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 x3d AES256-SHA256 RSA AES 256 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 x35 AES256-SHA RSA AES 256 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA x9c AES128-GCM-SHA256 RSA AESGCM 128 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 x3c AES128-SHA256 RSA AES 128 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 x2f AES128-SHA RSA AES 128 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA x05 RC4-SHA RSA RC4 128 TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA x04 RC4-MD5 RSA RC4 128 TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 x0a DES-CBC3-SHA RSA 3DES 168 TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA Running client simulations (HTTP) via sockets Android 4.2.2 TLSv1.0 AES128-SHA, No FS Android 4.4.2 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Android 5.0.0 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Android 6.0 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Android 7.0 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Android 8.1 (native) TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Android 9.0 (native) TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Chrome 65 Win 7 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Chrome 74 (Win 10) TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Firefox 62 Win 7 TLSv1.2 AES128-SHA, No FS Firefox 66 (Win 8.1/10) TLSv1.2 AES128-SHA, No FS IE 6 XP SSLv3 RC4-SHA, No FS IE 7 Vista TLSv1.0 AES128-SHA, No FS IE 8 Win 7 TLSv1.0 AES128-SHA, No FS IE 8 XP TLSv1.0 RC4-SHA, No FS IE 11 Win 7 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS IE 11 Win 8.1 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS IE 11 Win Phone 8.1 TLSv1.2 AES128-SHA256, No FS IE 11 Win 10 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Edge 15 Win 10 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Edge 17 (Win 10) TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Opera 60 (Win 10) TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Safari 9 iOS 9 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Safari 9 OS X 10.11 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Safari 10 OS X 10.12 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Apple ATS 9 iOS 9 No connection Tor 17.0.9 Win 7 TLSv1.0 AES128-SHA, No FS Java 6u45 TLSv1.0 AES128-SHA, No FS Java 7u25 TLSv1.0 AES128-SHA, No FS Java 8u161 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Java 9.0.4 TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS OpenSSL 1.0.1l TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS OpenSSL 1.0.2e TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Debian) TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS OpenSSL 1.1.1b (Debian) TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS Thunderbird (60.6) TLSv1.2 AES128-SHA, No FS Done 2019-09-19 00:16:38 [ 72s] --\>\> 210.197.64.173:443 (direct.tos.hirogin.co.jp) \<\<--